Read Past Posts
- RT @PhilosopherMail: 'Man cannot discover new oceans unless he has the courage to lose sight of the shore' – André Gide 3 hours ago
- Are we truly governed democratically? Three quarters of the world wants an Arctic Sanctuary. Why isn't it happening? facebook.com/greenpeaceuk/p… 1 week ago
- RT @billmckibben: Its official: climate warriors from 12 Pacific islands to blockade Australia's main coal port in traditional canoes http… 1 week ago
- RT @FishKnigge: Leaked @EU_Commission doc indicates Maltese Carmenu Vela as new #EU Fisheries Commissioner j.mp/1nxNVf4 #CFPreali… 2 weeks ago
- @Get_Headspace No worries - will do! Thanks for the response, R 4 weeks ago
Could compassion be the answer?
It may sound airy fairy – preachy – perhaps even simplistic to suggest that global issues could be solved by more understanding and kindness.
But it’s an honest question. And one that I don’t think comes with an easy answer.
The 21st century’s problems are wide-ranging. Yet, whilst varied – from uncaring NHS staff, to environmental injustices (see EJOLT for list), to gay intolerance to the global poverty that kills 18 million people every year – they seem characterised by a lack of compassion.
On visiting “The Great War in Portraits” exhibition at the National Portrait gallery at the weekend- visitors were exposed to visual representation of the depths of barbarism humanity can plunge to in order to kill one another. Such depths were described as a signal in a change of human nature; a loss of compassion.
Perhaps the two most striking exhibits for me were:
1) The Rock Drill, a bronze sculpture by Sir Jacob Epstein, originally created in 1913, to echo man’s increasing interest in machines and power. But in 1916, it was remodelled. Limbs were severed and the sculpture altered, thought to reflect Epstein‘s altered perception about the future of humanity – mutilated by loss and destruction.
2) The second, of which I can’t find a picture, was the before-and-after drawings of patients undergoing re-constructive facial surgery, following extensive war injuries.
So did the “Great War” and wars since kill more than just bodies? Do we need to go looking for compassion once again?
To emphasise – I certainly don’t want to be moralistic about all this.
After all, I know that I’m more culpable in this loss of compassion compared to the vast majority of the world’s population.
To quote from Thomas Pogge (ref below):
Many more people – some 360 million – have died from hunger and remediable diseases in peacetime in the 20 years since the end of the Cold War, than perished from wars, civil wars and government repression over the entire twentieth century. And poverty continues unabated, as the official statistics confirm…[and so on]“
I know this. And as one of the richest people on earth if I gave away more of my income, I could help this. Yet I only give so much. An embarrassingly small fraction considering my culpability in not solving the problem.
So from this I take, that compassion may well be the solution.
But compassion doesn’t seem too easy.
1. Thomas Pogge – “Politics as Usual – What lies behind the pro-poor rhetoric“
I went to Barcelona this weekend for the first time. I saw Gaudi and Picasso and was completely and utterly blown away. Brain fuzz.
Each artist’s strength lay in the radically new perspective they brought to their work. Although they saw the same things as everyone else, they explored their focus from previously untold angles. La Sagrada Familia embodies this radical approach – de-constructing and rebuilding the idea of a catholic cathedral so profoundly different to that found across the rest of Europe.
And so my thoughts (as always) returned to sustainability.
The story of kindness, of compassion, is one which – although I’m sure is familiar to many others – for me, has only recently connected to sustainability. I want to use this story to give a new perspective on working towards a greener, fairer world, and indeed, how we communicate about that ambition.
I think we care about creating a sustainable world because we care about one another.
Of course, “sustainability” embodies a whole host of concepts, from carbon permits to biodiversity offsetting to closed loop recycling. Money, reputation and politics make an inevitable appearance also.
But at the heart of the matter lies kindness; caring for one another – for our families, our children, our society. For our grandchildren and great-grandchildren as yet unborn, and for everyone who we share this moment of existence with.
So compassion can be seen as the driver.
Moreover, it’s also the facilitator. No one can create sustainable change alone – we need to collaborate. And this process requires us working to understand and be understanding with a whole host of people, many coming from perspectives and vested interests we may find challenging.
Only compassion can make this happen.
I don’t think these are just airy fairy words. Check out the great work from Common Cause on intrinsic values, the Dalai Lama’s words on environmentalism, Tom Shadyac’s documentary “I am”, or the International Campaign for Compassionate Cities.
Sustainability both demonstrates and requires compassion. What’s more, perhaps compassion provides a greater setting for the tale of environmentalism than offsets and permits?
Gaudi orchestrated such beauty through connecting the ideas of creativity, nature and morality. We need to explore every avenue we can in creating a world that works for us all. Why not start with kindness?
A list of time-saving measures which don’t work, learned from experience:
- Loading the washing machine while brushing your teeth.
- Unloading the washing machine while brushing your teeth.
- Going to the loo while still wearing your rucksack.
- Taking off your leggings and socks in one go.
- Picking bits of fluff off the floor instead of hoovering.
- Walking on the road instead of the pavement pulling luggage.
- Crossing busy roads one lane at a time.
- Drinking, texting or putting on your coat while walking.
- Stuffing receipts into your purse willy nilly – only to block your purse, and break your zip.
- Moving too quickly on the self-scan checkout machines.
- Being pushy in queues. The karma will haunt you.
- Multi-tasking is a #fail.
- There are no-shortcuts in life. We can only do less. :)
This inaninmate object is something I’ve been passed on by my in-laws. Apart from my husband – it’s one of the most useful items I’ve ever possessed; and certainly one I’ve spent the most time with.
Carrying my identify from Heathrow to Who Knows Where, I feel reassured every time I clap eyes on it at baggage reclaim.
Inanimate but calling me, I frequently push past small children to grab this from the moving belt.
Quickly before it goes, taking my toothbrush and make up, vest and necklace with it.
It carries my stuff, to make me whole and at home in another world.
Yet, it’s travelled journeys I will never know!
It lived a life before I wrote my name on “return to this address” label.
It’s been in planes and luggage carts, transfer trains and luggage holds that I will never see.
And it will live past me.
Even after its last plane ride, trusty, grubby synthetic fibres will outlast me in the darkness, buried in a landfill.